In re: Giuseppe Pileggi


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000090347-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00151-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00159-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000155567]. Mailed to: Ferry, Pileggi. [17-1676]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1676 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/14/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1676 In Re: GIUSEPPE PILEGGI, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:06-cr-00151-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00159-RJC) Submitted: September 7, 2017 Decided: September 14, 2017 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1676 Doc: 11 Filed: 09/14/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi’s Rule 41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2255 motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Pileggi’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?