In re: Giuseppe Pileggi

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000090347-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00151-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00159-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000155567]. Mailed to: Ferry, Pileggi. [17-1676]

Appeal: 17-1676

Doc: 11

Filed: 09/14/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1676

In Re: GIUSEPPE PILEGGI,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:06-cr-00151-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00159-RJC)

Submitted: September 7, 2017

Decided: September 14, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1676

Doc: 11

Filed: 09/14/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our
review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi’s Rule
41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2255
motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has
recently decided Pileggi’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

2