In re: Giuseppe Pileggi
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000090347-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00151-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00159-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Ferry, Pileggi. [17-1676]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: GIUSEPPE PILEGGI,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: September 7, 2017
Decided: September 14, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Giuseppe Pileggi, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Giuseppe Pileggi petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in acting on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion and 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our
review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Pileggi’s Rule
41(g) motion without prejudice by order entered July 26, 2017, and dismissed his § 2255
motion by order entered September 1, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has
recently decided Pileggi’s motions, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?