Redmond Howard v. Salisbury University


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--Motion to waive a specific defense is denied [1000110182-2], Motion to waive defnese is denied [1000101336-2]; Motion to add party is denied [1000110179-2]; motion for other permission to appeal is denied [1000102561-2], Motion for defer on previous motion to waive a defense is denied. [1000095894-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000098908-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00260-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000165329]. Mailed to: Redmond Howard. [17-1702]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1702 Doc: 25 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1702 REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SALISBURY UNIVERSITY, Member of the University System of Maryland; KONSTANTINE KYRIACOPOULOS, Associate Professor in the Department of Teacher Education; CHIN-HSIU CHEN, Chair of Department/Assistant Professor of Early Childhood Education; GEORGE OAKLEY; KEVIN BOWES; JOHN PAUL REHO; CARLTON INSLEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00260-JKB) Submitted: September 28, 2017 Decided: October 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Paul Reinhart, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1702 Doc: 25 Filed: 10/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Redmond Howard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing Howard’s civil action for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Howard’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Salisbury Univ., No. 1:17-cv-00260-JKB (D. Md. June 1, 2017). We deny Howard’s motions for permission to appeal, to waive a specific defense, to defer action on his previous motion to waive a defense, and to add a defendant. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?