In re: Sandra Elliott


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000106391-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000113122-2]. Originating case number: 5:09-cr-00383-BO-1 Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000176592]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [17-1761]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1761 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1761 IN RE: SANDRA ELLIOTT, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:09-cr-00383-BO-1) Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sandra Elliott, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1761 Doc: 13 Filed: 10/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Sandra Elliott petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her motion seeking to dismiss the criminal information and all related petitions and pleadings, to withdraw her plea agreement, and for return of property. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has now dismissed the motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently ruled on Elliott’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?