Sabrina Davis v. Bankers Life and Casualty Co.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000125742-2]; denying Motion requesting defendant to correct its informal brief [1000174122-2]. Originating case number: 6:16-cv-03100-TMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Sabrina Davis. [17-1869]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
SABRINA D. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:16-cv-03100-TMC)
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sabrina D. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Carmelo Barone Sammataro, TURNER, PADGET,
GRAHAM & LANEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Sabrina D. Davis appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment for Defendant in Davis’s civil
action related to a life insurance claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., No.
6:16-cv-03100-TMC (D.S.C. June 23, 2017). We deny Davis’s request to remove this
appeal to another United States Circuit Court and her motion for Defendant to correct its
informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?