Edgar Thomas v. The State of South Carolina


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-01345-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000163366]. Mailed to: Edgar Thomas. [17-1876]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1876 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1876 EDGAR THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-01345-CMC) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edgar Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1876 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Edgar Thomas appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss Thomas’ civil action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and its order denying Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. South Carolina, No. 3:17-cv-01345-CMC (D.S.C. June 27 & July 19, 2017); see also Robinson v. Wix Filtration Corp., 599 F.3d 403, 407 (4th Cir. 2010) (reviewing Rule 59(e) denial for abuse of discretion). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?