White Marlin Open, Inc. v. Phillip Heasley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-03105-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000265764]. [17-1901]
Appeal: 17-1901
Doc: 43
Filed: 03/28/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1901
WHITE MARLIN OPEN, INC.; JIM CONWAY; RICHARD KOSZTYU; MARK
HUTCHISON; PAT HORNING; DAVE ARNOLD; RICHARD HAMMOND;
BRIAN LEADER; DANIEL STUART; JOSH SHARP; BRIAN RUSSELL;
JOHN GUDELSKY; HUNTER PUSEY; J. D. MESSLER,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
PHILLIP G. HEASLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03105-RDB)
Submitted: February 23, 2018
Decided: March 28, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert F. Callahan, Jr., Christopher P. Sullivan, Sr., Boston, Massachusetts, Luke A.
Hasskamp, Eric J. Magnuson, ROBINS KAPLAN LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Jason
M. St. John, SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellant. David M. Wyand, ROSENBERG MARTIN GREENBERG, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland; Joseph E. Moore, WILLIAMS, MOORE, SHOCKLEY & HARRISON,
L.L.P., Ocean City, Maryland, for Appellee White Marlin Open. Hugh Cropper, IV,
Appeal: 17-1901
Doc: 43
Filed: 03/28/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
Curtis H. Booth, BOOTH BOOTH CROPPER & MARRINER, P.C., Ocean City,
Maryland, for Appellees Richard Kosztyu and Mark Hutchison.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-1901
Doc: 43
Filed: 03/28/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Phillip G. Heasley appeals the district court’s order entering judgment for the
Appellees on the claims in the complaint and Heasley’s counterclaims following a bench
trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. White Marlin Open, Inc. v. Heasley, No.
1:16-cv-03105-RDB (D. Md. July 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?