Ning Shen v. Sec US Dept Veterans Affair

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00001-GMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000325611].. [17-1911]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1911 Doc: 26 Filed: 07/09/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1911 NING SHEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00001-GMG) Submitted: May 02, 2018 Decided: July 9, 2018 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dallas Ian Hammer, ZUCKERMAN LAW, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Powell, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1911 Doc: 26 Filed: 07/09/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dr. Ning Shen appeals the district court’s order dismissing her action against the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Martinsburg, West Virginia. We have reviewed the record, as well as the parties’ briefing in this matter, and find no reversible error. See Hux v. City of Newport News, 451 F.3d 311, 315 (4th Cir. 2006) (a plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext warrants summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?