In re: Geary Katz
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00528-JFM, 14-10356, 14-00837, 14-00838. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000268319].. [17-2217]
Appeal: 17-2217
Doc: 19
Filed: 04/02/2018
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2217
In re: GEARY B. KATZ,
Debtor,
-----------------------------------------JUDY A. ROBBINS, U. S. Trustee; MICHAEL G. WOLFF,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
GEARY B. KATZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00528-JFM)
Submitted: March 29, 2018
Decided: April 2, 2018
Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geary B. Katz, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Michael Bernstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland; John Alfred Postulka, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Jeffrey Mitchell Orenstein, GOREN,
Appeal: 17-2217
Doc: 19
Filed: 04/02/2018
Pg: 2 of 3
WOLFF & ORENSTEIN, LLC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-2217
Doc: 19
Filed: 04/02/2018
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Geary B. Katz appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s
order denying Katz a discharge of his debts on the basis of 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Katz, No. 1:17-cv-00528-JFM (D.
Md. filed Sept. 18, 2017 & entered Sept. 19, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?