Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump

Filing 41

DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS (Local Rule 26.1) by Appellees Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3, Jane Doe #4, Jane Doe #5 and John Doe #6 in 17-2232. Was any question on Disclosure Form answered yes? No [1000182098] [17-2231, 17-2232, 17-2233, 17-2240] Mark Mosier [Entered: 10/27/2017 04:11 PM]

Download PDF
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DISCLOSURE OF CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS AND OTHER INTERESTS Disclosures must be filed on behalf of all parties to a civil, agency, bankruptcy or mandamus case, except that a disclosure statement is not required from the United States, from an indigent party, or from a state or local government in a pro se case. In mandamus cases arising from a civil or bankruptcy action, all parties to the action in the district court are considered parties to the mandamus case. Corporate defendants in a criminal or post-conviction case and corporate amici curiae are required to file disclosure statements. If counsel is not a registered ECF filer and does not intend to file documents other than the required disclosure statement, counsel may file the disclosure statement in paper rather than electronic form. Counsel has a continuing duty to update this information. 17-2232 No. __________ Iranian Alliances Across Borders v. Trump Caption: __________________________________________________ Pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and Local Rule 26.1, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3, Jane Doe #4, Jane Doe #5, John Doe #6 ______________________________________________________________________________ (name of party/amicus) ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiffs-Appellees who is _______________________, makes the following disclosure: (appellant/appellee/petitioner/respondent/amicus/intervenor) YES ✔ NO 1. Is party/amicus a publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity? 2. Does party/amicus have any parent corporations? YES ✔ NO If yes, identify all parent corporations, including all generations of parent corporations: 3. Is 10% or more of the stock of a party/amicus owned by a publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity? YES ✔ NO If yes, identify all such owners: 09/29/2016 SCC -1- 4. Is there any other publicly held corporation or other publicly held entity that has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the litigation (Local Rule 26.1(a)(2)(B))? YES ✔ NO If yes, identify entity and nature of interest: 5. Is party a trade association? (amici curiae do not complete this question) YES ✔ NO If yes, identify any publicly held member whose stock or equity value could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding or whose claims the trade association is pursuing in a representative capacity, or state that there is no such member: 6. Does this case arise out of a bankruptcy proceeding? If yes, identify any trustee and the members of any creditors’ committee: s/ Mark W. Mosier Signature: ____________________________________ YES ✔ NO October 27, 2017 Date: ___________________ All Plaintiffs Counsel for: __________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ************************** October 27, 2017 I certify that on _________________ the foregoing document was served on all parties or their counsel of record through the CM/ECF system if they are registered users or, if they are not, by serving a true and correct copy at the addresses listed below: s/ Mark W. Mosier _______________________________ (signature) October 27, 2017 ________________________ (date) -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?