Intl. Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
Filing
73
ORDER filed [1000188038] granting leave to file amicus curiae briefs. Copies to all parties. [17-2231, 17-2232, 17-2233, 17-2240] RW [Entered: 11/07/2017 10:00 AM]
FILED: November 7, 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
___________________
No. 17-2231 (L)
(8:17-cv-00361-TDC)
___________________
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban
Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients; HIAS, INC., on behalf of
itself and its clients; JOHN DOES #1 & 3; JANE DOE #2; MIDDLE EAST
STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and
its members; MUHAMMED METEAB; PAUL HARRISON; IBRAHIM AHMED
MOHOMED; ARAB AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK, on behalf
of itself and its clients
Plaintiffs - Appellees
and
ALLAN HAKKY; SAMANEH TAKALOO
Plaintiffs
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY;
DEPARTMENT OF STATE; OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL
INTELLIGENCE; ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary
of Homeland Security; REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of
State; DANIEL R. COATS, in his official capacity as Director of National
Intelligence
Defendants - Appellants
-----------------------------THE AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE; IMMIGRATION
REFORM LAW INSTITUTE; ALABAMA; ARKANSAS; FLORIDA;
LOUISIANA; OHIO; OKLAHOMA; SOUTH CAROLINA; TEXAS; WEST
VIRGINIA
Amici Supporting Appellant
___________________
ORDER
___________________
American Center for Law and Justice, Immigration Reform Law Institute,
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas,
and West Virginia have filed amicus curiae briefs.
The court accepts the briefs for filing.
For the Court--By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?