Leonard Clay v. Kenneth Riley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-03038-DCN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000302113]. Mailed to: Leonard Clay. [17-2239]

Appeal: 17-2239

Doc: 13

Filed: 05/29/2018

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2239

LEONARD L. CLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KENNETH RILEY, ILA Local Union 1422,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-03038-DCN)

Submitted: May 24, 2018

Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr., Cheryl H. Ledbetter, GIBBS
& HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-2239

Doc: 13

Filed: 05/29/2018

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Leonard L. Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action
alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clay’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Clay has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson
v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2