Joseph Thomas v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-12337. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000287484].. [17-2253]
Appeal: 17-2253
Doc: 23
Filed: 05/03/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2253
JOSEPH S. THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia,
at Beckley. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (5:16-cv-12337)
Submitted: April 26, 2018
Decided: May 3, 2018
Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Monica T. Monday, Leslie S. Bowers, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellant. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Mark B. Stern, Dennis
Fan, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C.; Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-2253
Doc: 23
Filed: 05/03/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph S. Thomas appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of the United States on his Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) suit. Because the
district court properly declined to apply West Virginia law governing equitable tolling,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. United States, No. 5:16cv-12337 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 2, 2017). See Anderson v. United States, 669 F.3d 161, 164
(4th Cir. 2011) (noting that federal law defines the limitations period for suits under the
FTCA). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?