In re: Randy Self


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [1000197971-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus [1000191752-2] Originating case number: 3:95-cr-00315-JFA-1,3:16-cv-01907-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000271913]. Mailed to: Randy Self. [17-2316]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-2316 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/06/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2316 In re: RANDY E. SELF, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:95-cr-00315-JFA-1; 3:16-cv-01907-JFA) Submitted: March 22, 2018 Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randy E. Self, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: April 6, 2018 Appeal: 17-2316 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/06/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Randy E. Self petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court issued an order granting § 2255 relief on December 15, 2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Self’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?