Regina Johnson v. Raymond Mitchell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00895-MGL. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000278564]. Mailed to: Regina Johnson. [17-2348]

Appeal: 17-2348

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/19/2018

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2348

REGINA DENISE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAYMOND MITCHELL; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
KENYETTA MCKNIGHT; MARK TURNER; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (3:17-cv-00895-MGL)

Submitted: April 17, 2018

Decided: April 19, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Regina Denise Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert E. Buhl, III, LAW OFFICES OF
HERBERT E. BUHL, III, Columbia, South Carolina; Terri Hearn Bailey, Assistant

Appeal: 17-2348

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/19/2018

Pg: 2 of 3

United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-2348

Doc: 14

Filed: 04/19/2018

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Regina Denise Johnson appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss
Johnson’s complaint. *

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Mitchell,
No. 3:17-cv-00895-MGL (D.S.C. filed Nov. 8, 2017 & entered Nov. 9, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

*

Although the district court dismissed the action without prejudice, the district
court’s order is final and appealable under Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807
F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015).

3