Gerod Stukes v. Paragon Systems, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00675-RAJ-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000355557]. Mailed to: Gerod Stukes. [17-2363]
Appeal: 17-2363
Doc: 15
Filed: 08/27/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2363
GEROD STUKES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARAGON SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00675-RAJ-RJK)
Submitted: August 23, 2018
Decided: August 27, 2018
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerod Stukes, Appellant Pro Se. Kyle Reese Elliott, Alexander Tevis Marshall,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-2363
Doc: 15
Filed: 08/27/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gerod Stukes appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to his
former employer, Paragon Systems, Inc., and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to
alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stukes v. Paragon
Sys., Inc., No. 2:16-cv-00675-RAJ-RJK (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2017, Nov. 27, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?