Ronald Calvin Williams v. NC State Board of Elections

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00265-MOC-DCK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000278626]. Mailed to: Ronald Calvin Williams 11226 Tradition View Drive Charlotte, NC 28269, Jeremy David Lindsley. [17-2367]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-2367 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/19/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2367 RONALD CALVIN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. NC STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Roy Cooper, Governor; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SECRETARY OF STATE, Elaine Marshall, Secretary, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00265-MOC-DCK) Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 19, 2018 Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Calvin Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-2367 Doc: 13 Filed: 04/19/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Calvin Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Williams’ motion for summary judgment as moot, and the magistrate judge’s order denying Williams’ motion to amend his amended complaint as futile. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court and the magistrate judge. Williams v. NC State Bd. of Elections, No. 3:17-cv-00265-MOC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2017 & Oct. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?