T.A. Hall v. Better Housing Coalition

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to examine validity of documents; Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3 & 4 [1000219763-2], denying Motion alert & protection, safe haven for Hall "The Sovereign" from Union Bank & Trust threatening acts of injury and life safety [1000288257-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000219768-3]; denying Motion to extend filing time [1000219768-2]. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00727-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000295302]. Mailed to: Tacitus A. Hall. [17-2408]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-2408 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/16/2018 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2408 T. A. HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BETTER HOUSING COALITION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00727-REP) Submitted: April 26, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tacitus A. Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: May 16, 2018 Appeal: 17-2408 Doc: 11 Filed: 05/16/2018 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tacitus A. Hall appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil suit for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Better Housing Coalition, No. 3:17-cv-00727-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 28, 2017). We deny all of Hall’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?