Mohsen Khordehforosh v. Anna Wright
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion for Question of law and to present materials under seal to Chief Judge Gregory [1000221701-2] denied, Motion for violation of laws [1000219436-2] denied, Motion to recuse judges [1000213878-2] denied, Motion to redact filings [1000213869-2] denied, Motion for perjury [1000213866-2] denied, Motion re: rule 60(d)(2) and rule 60(b)(3) violation [1000211147-2] denied; Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000211143-2] denied. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00628-GCM,17-31638. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000302107]. Mailed to: Mohsen Khordehforosh. [17-2411]
Appeal: 17-2411
Doc: 30
Filed: 05/29/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2411
MOHSEN KHORDEHFOROSH,
Party-in-Interest - Appellant,
and
MOE’S RX CLINIC, INC.,
Debtor,
v.
ANNA COTTON WRIGHT,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00628-GCM)
Submitted: May 24, 2018
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohsen Khordehforosh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 29, 2018
Appeal: 17-2411
Doc: 30
Filed: 05/29/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mohsen Khordehforosh appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his
appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing the Chapter 7 bankruptcy case filed
by Moe’s Rx Clinic, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Khordehforosh v.
Wright, No. 3:17-cv-00628-GCM (W.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2017). We deny Khordenforosh’s
pending motions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?