Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00774-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000290051]. Mailed to: Toby Mackall. [17-2435]
Appeal: 17-2435
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/08/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2435
TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CLARK W. LEMASTERS,
JR., Major General, U.S. Army, TACOM Commanding General; TIMOTHY D.
LUEDECKING, Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Assistant, OUSD ATL; MYRON L.
BELL, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army; MATTHEW D. TOBIN, Major, U.S.
Army, Detailed Inspector General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00774-RDB)
Submitted: April 26, 2018
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Toby Roberto Mackall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 8, 2018
Appeal: 17-2435
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/08/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Toby Roberto Mackall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
complaint asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680
(2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.
388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mackall v. Dep’t of Defense, No. 1:17cv-00774-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?