Starsha Sewell v. Mark Pritchard
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-01439-PJM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000262167]. Mailed to: Starsha Sewell, M.ED. [17-2461]
Appeal: 17-2461
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/22/2018
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-2461
STARSHA M. SEWELL, M.ED.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARK PRITCHARD, Regional Transportation Agency of Central Maryland,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHN P. DAVEY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:17-cv-01439-PJM)
Submitted: March 19, 2018
Decided: March 22, 2018
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Menkel McGuire, LAW OFFICE OF
MELISSA MENKEL MCGUIRE LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-2461
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/22/2018
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders entering judgment for
Defendants in this action brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Sewell v. Pritchard, No. 8:17-cv-01439-PJM (D. Md. June 1
& Dec. 22, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?