Bernard Hollomond v. Shannon Hadeed

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00705-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000027916]. Mailed to: Bernard Hollomond CHESAPEAKE CITY JAIL 400 Albemarle Drive Chesapeake, VA 23322. [17-6006]

Appeal: 17-6006

Doc: 11

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6006

BERNARD HOLLOMOND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHANNON HADEED, Attorney; TIMOTHY S. WRIGHT, Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:16-cv-00705-HEH-RCY)

Submitted:

February 16, 2017

Decided:

February 22, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DUNCAN, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Hollomond, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6006

Doc: 11

Filed: 02/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Bernard Hollomond seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice
for failure to comply with the court’s prior order directing
Hollomond to pay an initial partial filing fee or aver that he
cannot pay the fee under penalty of perjury.
41(b).

See Fed. R. Civ. P.

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in

the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hollomond’s
informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Hollomond has forfeited appellate review of
the court’s order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423,

430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2