US v. Timothy Leak
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02166-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000089173]. Mailed to: Timothy Leak. [17-6007, 17-6190]
Appeal: 17-6007
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY LEAK,
Respondent - Appellant.
No. 17-6190
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY LEAK,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina,
at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:14-hc-02166-BR)
Appeal: 17-6007
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Leak, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL
CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-6007
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Leak appeals from the district court’s orders denying his pro se motions
to vacate the November 2014 judgment committing him to the custody and care of the
Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246(d) (2012) and for a discharge hearing
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Leak, No. 5:14-hc-02166-BR (E.D.N.C. Dec. 16, 2016; Jan. 3, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?