Ronnie Vanzant v. Berry Weissgla
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02876-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Ronnie Joe Vanzant. [17-6032]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RONNIE JOE VANZANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
DR. BERRY WEISSGLASS; DR. THEODOLPH JACOBS; KAREN HUFFMAN,
Defendants – Appellees,
CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; DIRECTOR DAWN
FRAZIER; NURSE MICHAEL MURRY,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02876-RBH)
Submitted: June 15, 2017
Before KING, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: July 6, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Ronnie Joe Vanzant, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Willcox Buyck, Gordon Wade Cooper,
BUYCK SANDERS & SIMMONS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the
Defendants on Vanzant’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action claiming deliberate indifference
to his serious medical needs and the court’s order denying reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on
the reasoning of the district court. Vanzant v. Weissglass, No. 8:15-cv-02876-RBH
(D.S.C., Sept. 6, 2016 & Dec. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?