US v. Hassan Hine


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:07-cr-00323-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000044182]. Mailed to: Hassan Genell Hines. [17-6060]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6060 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/17/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6060 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. HASSAN GENELL HINES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00323-BO-1) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and March 17, 2017 DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hassan Genell Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Thomas B. Murphy, Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6060 Doc: 7 Filed: 03/17/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Hassan several Genell drug district court imprisonment. judgment. and Hines was firearm sentenced On convicted charges Hines direct to and a appeal, by a in January total this federal of court 480 jury 2009, the months affirmed of of the United States v. Hines, 380 F. App’x 320 (4th Cir. 2010) (No. 09-4060). In January 2017, Hines filed a second notice of appeal of the criminal judgment. However, because we have previously affirmed this criminal judgment, we dismiss the appeal as duplicative and untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?