Victor Calles v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03338-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Calles. [17-6070]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03338-BO)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 4, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Calles, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce, Acting United States Attorney, Rudy
E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Victor Calles appeals the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking relief
under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012) . We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm
substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Calles v. United States, No.
5:15-ct-03338-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 2017); see also Ponormo v. United States, 814 F.3d
681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016) (recognizing that issues raised for first time on appeal are
waived). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?