James Sowell, Jr. v. Joshua Walsh

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000089117]. Mailed to: Appellant and attorney Kimberly Rehberg. [17-6083]

Appeal: 17-6083

Doc: 10

Filed: 05/26/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6083

JAMES ODIS SOWELL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSHUA WALSH,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
AMANDA CRAIG; JAMES P. DORNFRIED,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Odis Sowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly Martin Rehberg, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Appeal: 17-6083

Doc: 10

Filed: 05/26/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-6083

Doc: 10

Filed: 05/26/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
James Odis Sowell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to grant Joshua Walsh’s summary judgment motion, and deny
Sowell’s summary judgment motion in Sowell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We
have considered Sowell’s arguments on appeal and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sowell v. Walsh,
No. 1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2016).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3