James Sowell, Jr. v. Joshua Walsh
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Appellant and attorney Kimberly Rehberg. [17-6083]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
JAMES ODIS SOWELL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee,
AMANDA CRAIG; JAMES P. DORNFRIED,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Loretta Copeland Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Odis Sowell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Kimberly Martin Rehberg, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
James Odis Sowell, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to grant Joshua Walsh’s summary judgment motion, and deny
Sowell’s summary judgment motion in Sowell’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We
have considered Sowell’s arguments on appeal and discern no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sowell v. Walsh,
No. 1:15-cv-00757-LCB-JLW (M.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?