US v. Qualo Lowery
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000026982-2]. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6090]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
QUALO MARTEZ LOWERY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Qualo Martez Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States
Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Kevin Zolot, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Qualo Martez Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction
motion to dismiss both the indictment and the information filed by the Government
pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Lowery’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowery, No. 3:05-cr-00216RJC-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?