US v. Qualo Lowery


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000026982-2]. Originating case number: 3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000091284]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6090]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6090 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6090 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. QUALO MARTEZ LOWERY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:05-cr-00216-RJC-2) Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Qualo Martez Lowery, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, Kevin Zolot, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6090 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Qualo Martez Lowery appeals the district court’s order denying his postconviction motion to dismiss both the indictment and the information filed by the Government pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lowery’s motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lowery, No. 3:05-cr-00216RJC-2 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?