US v. Orlando Black
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02180-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000089078]. Mailed to: Orlando Black. [17-6091]
Appeal: 17-6091
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6091
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ORLANDO BLACK,
Respondent – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:15-hc-02180-BR)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Orlando Black, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL
CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6091
Doc: 9
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Orlando Black appeals from the district court’s order denying his motions to vacate
his civil commitment or to hold a discharge hearing. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Black, No. 5:15-hc-02180-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan.
3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?