US v. Orlando Black


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02180-BR. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000089078]. Mailed to: Orlando Black. [17-6091]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6091 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6091 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ORLANDO BLACK, Respondent – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:15-hc-02180-BR) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orlando Black, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer Dee Dannels, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6091 Doc: 9 Filed: 05/26/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Orlando Black appeals from the district court’s order denying his motions to vacate his civil commitment or to hold a discharge hearing. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, No. 5:15-hc-02180-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?