US v. Jonathan D. Davey

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to toll defendant's AEDPA deadline until appeal of order is complete. [1000020668-2] Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00068-RJC-DSC-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000111616]. Mailed to: Jonathan D. Davey. [17-6154]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6154 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/05/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6154 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JONATHAN D. DAVEY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. David S. Cayer, Magistrate Judge. (3:12-cr-00068-RJC-DSC-1) Submitted: June 29, 2017 Decided: July 5, 2017 Before TRAXLER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan D. Davey, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Bain-Creed, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Anthony Joseph Enright, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6154 Doc: 13 Filed: 07/05/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan D. Davey appeals the district court’s text order of January 23, 2017 denying his motion to compel former counsel to surrender his case file. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davey, No. 3:12-cr-00068-RJC-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2017). We deny Davey’s motion to toll his habeas filing deadline and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?