Jamar Cannon v. Edward Hull


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000117508]. Mailed to: Jamar Cannon. [17-6167]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6167 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/13/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6167 JAMAR A. CANNON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HULL; PHYLLIS BACK, Major; DARRYL TURNER, Captain of Security; CAPTAIN HICKEY; D. LUBEKE; OFFICER STEPHAN; SERGEANT BERRY; MICHELLE LEWIS, Director of Inmate Services, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00359-LMB-TCB) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: July 13, 2017 Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamar A. Cannon, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Rodrigue Jurjevich, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6167 Doc: 17 Filed: 07/13/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jamar A. Cannon seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Cannon seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?