US v. Daniel King


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-hc-02009-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000115897]. Mailed to: Daniel H. King. [17-6181]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6181 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/11/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6181 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner - Appellee, v. DANIEL H. KING, Respondent - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:10-hc-02009-FL) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: July 11, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Bredenberg, Michael Lockridge, Special Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6181 Doc: 8 Filed: 07/11/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Daniel H. King appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to vacate his civil commitment and dismiss his case for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. King, No. 5:10-hc-02009-FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?