George Altman v. Warden Hollenbaek


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000035316-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02256-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000091290]. Mailed to: George Riley Altman UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY ATLANTA P. O. Box 150160 Atlanta, GA 30315-0182. [17-6213]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6213 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6213 GEORGE RILEY ALTMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN HOLLENBAEK, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02256-D) Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Riley Altman, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6213 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: George Riley Altman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Altman v. Hollenbaek, No. 5:15-hc-02256-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?