George Altman v. Warden Hollenbaek
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000035316-2] Originating case number: 5:15-hc-02256-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000091290]. Mailed to: George Riley Altman UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY ATLANTA P. O. Box 150160 Atlanta, GA 30315-0182. [17-6213]
Appeal: 17-6213
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/31/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6213
GEORGE RILEY ALTMAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN HOLLENBAEK,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02256-D)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Riley Altman, Appellant Pro Se. Genna Danelle Petre, Special Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6213
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/31/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
George Riley Altman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Altman v. Hollenbaek, No. 5:15-hc-02256-D
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?