Ken Davis v. Robert McCabe


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00179-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000106019]. Mailed to: K Davis. [17-6216]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6216 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6216 KEN C. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROBERT MCCABE; MAJOR SPRUILL; MRS. MCDONALD; MRS. JACKSON, Defendants – Appellees, and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STU; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00179-MSD-LRL) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ken C. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Appeal: 17-6216 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6216 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Ken C. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Davis’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Davis has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?