Ken Davis v. Robert McCabe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00179-MSD-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000106019]. Mailed to: K Davis. [17-6216]

Appeal: 17-6216

Doc: 16

Filed: 06/23/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6216

KEN C. DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT MCCABE; MAJOR SPRUILL; MRS. MCDONALD; MRS. JACKSON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; STU; HAROLD W. CLARKE,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00179-MSD-LRL)

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 23, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ken C. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Lewis Stone, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR P.C.,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Appeal: 17-6216

Doc: 16

Filed: 06/23/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-6216

Doc: 16

Filed: 06/23/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Ken C. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Davis’ informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Davis has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th
Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3