Ronnie Cousins v. Justin Aronson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01505-CMH-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107707]. Mailed to: R. Cousins. [17-6217, 17-6339]
Appeal: 17-6217
Doc: 22
Filed: 06/27/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6217
RONNIE MATTHEWS COUSINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN R. ARONSON, Police Officer/Sergeant #354,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 17-6339
RONNIE MATTHEWS COUSINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUSTIN R. ARONSON, Police Officer/Sergeant #354,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01505-CMH-JFA)
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 27, 2017
Appeal: 17-6217
Doc: 22
Filed: 06/27/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Matthews Cousins, Appellant Pro Se. Julie A. C. Seyfarth, Assistant County
Attorney, Emily Claire Russell, CHESTERFIELD COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Chesterfield, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-6217
Doc: 22
Filed: 06/27/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Ronnie Matthews Cousins appeals the district
court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Cousins v. Aronson, No. 1:15-cv-01505-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va.
Jan. 10, 2017; Feb. 14, 2017; Feb. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?