US v. Andrew Jackson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107729].. [17-6220, 17-6221]

Appeal: 17-6220

Doc: 6

Filed: 06/27/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio
Bady, Sway,
Defendant - Appellant

No. 17-6221

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDREW CHARLES JACKSON, a/k/a William Benbow, a/k/a Ricky Antonio
Bady, a/k/a Sway,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1; 3:00cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1)

Appeal: 17-6220

Doc: 6

Filed: 06/27/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Submitted: June 22, 2017

Decided: June 27, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew Charles Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United
States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-6220

Doc: 6

Filed: 06/27/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Andrew Charles Jackson appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions to reduce sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. 3:00-cr-00046-JPB-RWT-1;
3:00-cr-00006-JPB-RWT-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3