US v. Marlow Farmer
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000081446-2]; denying Motion to file supplemental brief(s) [1000062854-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [1000045301-2] Originating case number: 7:97-cr-40008-JLK-4 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: M Farmer. [17-6222]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
MARLOW ANDRE FARMER, a/k/a Andre Womack, a/k/a Dred,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:97-cr-40008-JLK-4)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlow Andre Farmer, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Donald Ray
Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorneys, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Marlow Andre Farmer seeks to appeal his 1997 criminal judgment. Because we
have already considered an appeal from the same order, we dismiss the appeal. See
United States v. Lipford, 203 F.3d 259 (4th Cir. 2000). We deny Farmer’s motions for a
transcript, to file a supplement, and to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?