US v. Luis Sanchez-Castro


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [1000046583-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00086-TDS-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000106083]. Mailed to: Luis Enrique Sanchez-Castro. [17-6223]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6223 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6223 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LUIS ENRIQUE SANCHEZ-CASTRO, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:13-cr-00086-TDS-1) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 23, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Luis Enrique Sanchez-Castro, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Harry L. Hobgood, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6223 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Luis Sanchez-Castro appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of his sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sanchez-Castro, No. 1:13-cr-00086-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2017). We deny Sanchez-Castro’s motion for transcripts at government expense, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?