US v. Richard Bernard

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to extend filing time as moot [1000049865-2]. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000122723]. Mailed to: Richard Dwight Bernard. [17-6225]

Appeal: 17-6225

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/21/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6225

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD DWIGHT BERNARD,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3)

Submitted: July 18, 2017

Decided: July 21, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Dwight Bernard, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6225

Doc: 7

Filed: 07/21/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Bernard, No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny
Bernard’s motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2