US v. Richard Bernard
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to extend filing time as moot [1000049865-2]. Originating case number: 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Richard Dwight Bernard. [17-6225]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
RICHARD DWIGHT BERNARD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3)
Submitted: July 18, 2017
Decided: July 21, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Dwight Bernard, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Richard Dwight Bernard appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Bernard, No. 3:03-cr-00420-JRS-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 30, 2017). We deny
Bernard’s motion for an enlargement of time to appeal as moot and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?