Steven Dixon Prentice v. Barry Edward
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03006-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellant. [17-6230]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
BARRY EDWARDS, Unit Manager - FTC Oklahoma; HSA GRISMER, Health
Services Administrator - FCI El Reno; H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden (former) - FCI El
Reno; JASON SICKLER, Legal Counsel - BOP South Central Regional Office;
MR. COMMACHO, Unit Manager (former) - FCI Butner; ANGELA DUNBAR,
Warden (former) - Butner Medium II; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden - Butner
Medium II; ANDREA RICHARDSON, Case Manager,
Defendants – Appellees,
BUREAU OF PRISONS; ADRIAN TOWE, Unit Team Counselor - FCI Butner,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:15-ct-03006-H)
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prentice v.
Edwards, No. 5:15-ct-03006-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2017).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?