Steven Dixon Prentice v. Barry Edward


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03006-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107636]. Mailed to: appellant. [17-6230]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6230 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6230 STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARRY EDWARDS, Unit Manager - FTC Oklahoma; HSA GRISMER, Health Services Administrator - FCI El Reno; H.A. LEDEZMA, Warden (former) - FCI El Reno; JASON SICKLER, Legal Counsel - BOP South Central Regional Office; MR. COMMACHO, Unit Manager (former) - FCI Butner; ANGELA DUNBAR, Warden (former) - Butner Medium II; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden - Butner Medium II; ANDREA RICHARDSON, Case Manager, Defendants – Appellees, and BUREAU OF PRISONS; ADRIAN TOWE, Unit Team Counselor - FCI Butner, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:15-ct-03006-H) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 17-6230 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6230 Doc: 10 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Steven Dixon Prentice appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prentice v. Edwards, No. 5:15-ct-03006-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?