Willie Pennix v. Standford
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01643-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Pennix. [17-6259]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SGT STANDFORD; LT DRUMMOND; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01643-RDB)
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Willie Pennix appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?