Willie Pennix v. Standford


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01643-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107701]. Mailed to: Pennix. [17-6259]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6259 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6259 WILLIE PENNIX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT STANDFORD; LT DRUMMOND; OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01643-RDB) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Pennix, Appellant Pro Se. Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6259 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Willie Pennix appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pennix v. Standford, No. 1:16-cv-01643-RDB (D. Md. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?