Roger Earl Coley v. Frank Perry
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00008-TDS-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000091445]. Mailed to: Roger Earl Coley ALBEMARLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 460 Badin, NC 28009. [17-6261]
Appeal: 17-6261
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/31/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6261
ROGER EARL COLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FRANK PERRY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Joe L. Webster, Magistrate Judge. (1:17-cv-00008-TDS-JLW)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Earl Coley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 31, 2017
Appeal: 17-6261
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/31/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Roger Earl Coley seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order and
recommendation denying Coley’s request for counsel and recommending the action be
construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and dismissed without prejudice. This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Coley seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?