Drain Short v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000043580-3] Originating case number: 8:16-cv-00319-GJH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000128034].. [17-6265]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6265 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6265 DRAIN MAURICE SHORT, a/k/a Dwayne A. Shorter, a/k/a Drain M. Short, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; J. PHILLIP MORGAN, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-00319-GJH) Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Drain Maurice Short, Appellant Pro Se. Meghan Renee Hatfield Yanacek, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6265 Doc: 18 Filed: 07/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Drain Maurice Short appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Short’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Short v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., No. 8:16-cv-00319-GJH (D. Md. filed Feb. 3, 2017; entered Feb. 6, 2017). We deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?