US v. Tyrone Harrison
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case numbers: 3:14-cr-00154-REP-DJN-1, 3:16-cv-00361-REP-DJN Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000089146]. Mailed to: Appellant. [17-6278]
Appeal: 17-6278
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6278
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TYRONE ANTHONY HARRISON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, Magistrate Judge. (3:14-cr-00154-REP-DJN-1; 3:16-cv00361-REP-DJN)
Submitted: May 23, 3027
Decided: May 26, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Anthony Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6278
Doc: 6
Filed: 05/26/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Anthony Harrison seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his
motions for default judgment in his pending 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) action. This court
may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b);
Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Harrison
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?