Duane Letroy Berry v. Bridgewater Capital


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00013-GCM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107621]. Mailed to: Duane Letroy Berry MIDLAND COUNTY JAIL 105 Fast Ice Drive Midland, MI 48642. [17-6299]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6299 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6299 DUANE LETROY BERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BRIDGEWATER CAPITAL, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00013-GCM) Submitted: June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duane Letroy Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6299 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/27/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Duane Letroy Berry appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his common law tort complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012), dismissing as moot his motion to amend an order regarding his prisoner trust account, and denying his motions for entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68, for writ of assistance pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 70, for a pretrial conference, and to freeze assets. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v. Bridgewater Capital, No. 3:17-cv-00013-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2017; Feb. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?