Duane Letroy Berry v. Bridgewater Capital
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:17-cv-00013-GCM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000107621]. Mailed to: Duane Letroy Berry MIDLAND COUNTY JAIL 105 Fast Ice Drive Midland, MI 48642. [17-6299]
Appeal: 17-6299
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/27/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6299
DUANE LETROY BERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIDGEWATER CAPITAL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00013-GCM)
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 27, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duane Letroy Berry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-6299
Doc: 11
Filed: 06/27/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Duane Letroy Berry appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his common law
tort complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2012), dismissing as moot his
motion to amend an order regarding his prisoner trust account, and denying his motions
for entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68, for writ of assistance pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 70, for a pretrial conference, and to freeze assets. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Berry v. Bridgewater Capital, No. 3:17-cv-00013-GCM (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8,
2017; Feb. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?