Christopher Mosby v. Eric Syke
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000056028-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000056027-2] Originating case number: 5:15-ct-03202-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123522]. Mailed to: Christopher Mosby. [17-6306]
Appeal: 17-6306
Doc: 26
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6306
CHRISTOPHER MOSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ERIC SYKES; STEVE LENAIER; CHRIS SASSER; CHARLIE MILLER; JOHN
INGRAM; UNKNOWN OFFICER,
Defendants -Appellees,
and
BRUNSWICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:15-ct-03202-BO)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 17-6306
Doc: 26
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Christopher Mosby, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher J. Geis, WOMBLE CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Patrick Grayson
Spaugh, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-6306
Doc: 26
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Mosby appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Mosby’s motions for appointment of counsel and for return
of property and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mosby v. Sykes, No.
5:15-ct-03202-BO (E.D.N.C., Feb. 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?