US v. Michael Paul Puzey


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000079494-2]; denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [1000082452-2]; granting Motion for leave to file a reply to the Government's objection to motion for release [1000094625-2] Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16,3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000124497]. Mailed to: Michael Paul Puzey. [17-6316]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6316 Doc: 29 Filed: 07/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6316 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16; 3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2) Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 25, 2017 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Paul Puzey, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6316 Doc: 29 Filed: 07/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Paul Puzey appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s prior order denying relief on Puzey’s Fed. R Civ. P. 60(d) (3) motion challenging his underlying conviction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Puzey, Nos. 3:00-cr-00057-GMG-RWT-16; 3:00-cr-00064-GMG-2 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 21, 2017). We deny Puzey’s motions for appointment of counsel and for bail or release pending appeal; we grant Puzey’s motion to file a reply to the Government’s objection to his motion for release. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?