Curtis King v. Official McPherson


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 0:15-cv-02358-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000089157]. Mailed to: Curtis King. [17-6320]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6320 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/26/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6320 CURTIS L. KING, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. OFFICIAL MCPHERSON, Lee Corr Inst; SGT BOATWRIGHT, Lee Corr Inst; CAPT PACK, Turbeville Corr Inst; LT SHANNON, Turbeville Corr Inst; OFFICER MCELVEEN, Turbeville Corr Inst; OFFICER BARNES, Turbeville Corr Inst; LT SEIBELS; CAPTAIN WASHINGTON, Broad River Corr Inst, individual & official capacity et al. known & unknown; SGT CARLTON ASHE; SGT DEBRA MCFADDEN, Defendants – Appellees, and DHO PATTERSON, Lee Corr Inst; WARDEN REYNOLDS, Lee Corr Inst; SHAKE DOWN TEAM, at Lee Corr Inst/Turbeville; DHO BROWN, Turbeville Corr Inst; W CHRISTOPHER SWETT, appointed counsel, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (0:15-cv-02358-RBH) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Decided: May 26, 2017 Appeal: 17-6320 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/26/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Albert Kinney, Jr., Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY LAW FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-6320 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/26/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Curtis L. King appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. McPherson, No. 0:15-cv-02358-RBH (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?