David Wattleton v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000058755-2] Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03063-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000144682]. Mailed to: David Wattleton. [17-6329]

Appeal: 17-6329

Doc: 17

Filed: 08/28/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6329

DAVID EARL WATTLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03063-BO)

Submitted: August 24, 2017

Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wattleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6329

Doc: 17

Filed: 08/28/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David Wattleton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Wattleton v. Lynch, No. 5:16-ct-03063-BO (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2