Theodore Sullivan v. Rodney Younce

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00010-REP-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000152933]. Mailed to: T Sullivan. [17-6340]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6340 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6340 THEODORE SULLIVAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. R. W. YOUNCE, Former Warden, sued in their individual and official capacities; PEARSON, Warden, sued in their individual and official capacities; HARRISON, Lt. Invs., sued in their individual and official capacities; MEDILIA, Sgt., sued in their individual and official capacities; WENDY S. HOBBS, Eastern Regional Administrator, sue in her individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00010-REP-RCY) Submitted: August 31, 2017 Decided: September 11, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theodore Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Hoehl O’Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6340 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/11/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Theodore Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sullivan v. Younce, No. 3:15-cv-00010-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?