US v. James Sweet

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000091258]. Mailed to: James Sweets. [17-6354]

Appeal: 17-6354

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/31/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6354

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES DANA SWEETS, a/k/a Sweets,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4)

Submitted: May 25, 2017

Decided: May 31, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Dana Sweets, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-6354

Doc: 14

Filed: 05/31/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James Dana Sweets appeals the district court’s letter order rejecting as meritless
his objection to subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for a new trial. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sweets, No. 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4
(D. Md. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2