US v. James Sweet
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: James Sweets. [17-6354]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
JAMES DANA SWEETS, a/k/a Sweets,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 31, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Dana Sweets, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
James Dana Sweets appeals the district court’s letter order rejecting as meritless
his objection to subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for a new trial. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sweets, No. 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4
(D. Md. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?