US v. James Sweet


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000091258]. Mailed to: James Sweets. [17-6354]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-6354 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6354 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES DANA SWEETS, a/k/a Sweets, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4) Submitted: May 25, 2017 Decided: May 31, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Dana Sweets, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-6354 Doc: 14 Filed: 05/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James Dana Sweets appeals the district court’s letter order rejecting as meritless his objection to subject matter jurisdiction and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sweets, No. 1:04-cr-00564-CCB-4 (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?